Libraries have been covered in previous potted histories, principally the place and British histories. Using that information as a base, and with the assistance of ChatGPT, I have produced this article which concentrates on this subject.
Libraries are almost as old as writing itself. Once human societies learned to record information, they faced a second problem: how to preserve what had been written and retrieve it when it was needed. The earliest libraries therefore developed not primarily as collections of literature for people to read for pleasure, but as archives containing the records of governments, temples and commercial organisations. Over several thousand years their purpose broadened. Libraries became repositories of religious and scholarly knowledge, centres of education, symbols of royal and civic status and, eventually, institutions intended to make books and information available to almost everyone.
The history of the library is consequently also a history of changing attitudes towards knowledge. For much of that history books were scarce and expensive and access to them was restricted to rulers, priests, monks, scholars and the wealthy. Only with the spread of printing, rising literacy and the development of publicly funded institutions did the library gradually become something that ordinary people could regard as their own.
The First Libraries: Mesopotamia
Writing first developed in southern Mesopotamia, particularly among the Sumerians, during the fourth millennium BCE. The earliest writing was largely practical. Scribes used a reed stylus to make wedge-shaped marks in soft clay tablets, producing what became known as cuneiform. Many surviving early tablets record such matters as grain, livestock, land, taxation and payments.
Where records accumulated, some means of storing and organising them became necessary. Temples and palaces therefore developed archives containing hundreds and eventually thousands of clay tablets. These were not libraries in the modern sense, but they established some of the principles upon which later libraries depended. Documents were collected in one place, sometimes classified according to subject, labelled and stored systematically so that particular records could be found again.
As Mesopotamian civilisation developed, writing came to be used for far more than administration. Mathematical, medical, astronomical, religious and literary works were recorded on tablets, while generations of scribes copied older texts as part of their education. Collections consequently became repositories not merely of records but of accumulated knowledge.
The best-known surviving example is considerably later than the Sumerians. In the seventh century BCE the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal assembled a substantial collection at his capital, Nineveh. More than 30,000 tablets and fragments from what is generally called the Library of Ashurbanipal have been discovered. They included religious rituals, medical and astronomical texts, dictionaries, omens, administrative documents and works of literature, among them versions of the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Ashurbanipal deliberately sought texts from throughout his empire and had important works copied for his collection. In that respect his library was more than an archive. It represented a conscious attempt to collect and preserve learning.
The clay tablet also had one considerable advantage as a library medium: durability. Fire, which would destroy papyrus, parchment or paper, could bake clay tablets harder. As a result, tens of thousands of Mesopotamian texts have survived for modern archaeologists to recover.
Ancient Egypt
Writing developed independently in Egypt at about the end of the fourth millennium BCE. Egyptian hieroglyphs were used particularly for monumental and religious purposes, while more convenient scripts such as hieratic were employed for everyday writing. Although texts could be written on pottery, stone and wooden tablets, the material most closely associated with Egyptian books was papyrus.
Papyrus was lighter and more portable than clay, and long texts could be written on sheets joined together to form rolls. It was, however, much less durable, particularly in damp conditions. This helps to explain why our knowledge of early Egyptian libraries is less complete than our knowledge of Mesopotamian tablet collections.
Temples, palaces and administrative centres kept collections of written material, and Egyptian temples sometimes contained institutions traditionally known as Houses of Life. These appear to have been associated with scribes, religious learning, copying and the preservation of texts. As elsewhere in the ancient world, however, such collections were intended for a small educated minority rather than the general population.
Later, the most famous library established in Egypt belonged to a substantially Greek world. After Alexander the Great conquered Egypt in the fourth century BCE and founded Alexandria, the country eventually came under the rule of the Greek-speaking Ptolemaic dynasty. During the early third century BCE the Ptolemies established at Alexandria a scholarly institution known as the Mouseion, from which our word “museum” derives, together with its celebrated library.
The intention appears to have been to collect copies of as much of the known world’s written knowledge as possible. Agents acquired manuscripts from throughout the Greek-speaking world, while scholars were attracted to Alexandria to study, edit and interpret them. The library became associated with such figures as Eratosthenes, who calculated the circumference of the Earth, and Callimachus, whose Pinakes was an extensive bibliographical catalogue of Greek literature.
The precise size of the Library of Alexandria is unknown and ancient figures for the number of scrolls should be treated cautiously. Equally misleading is the familiar story that the entire library disappeared in a single catastrophic fire. Parts of collections may have been damaged when Julius Caesar fought in Alexandria in 48 BCE, but the institution and related collections appear to have survived. Decline and destruction occurred over a long period as political circumstances changed.
Nevertheless, Alexandria established an enduring ideal: the library not merely as a store of documents but as a deliberate attempt to bring together knowledge for scholarly use.
Libraries in Ancient Greece
The Greeks inherited writing traditions from earlier civilisations but developed a different literary culture. By the classical period works of poetry, drama, philosophy, history, mathematics and science circulated in written form alongside the continuing importance of oral teaching.
Private collections of books appeared among wealthy and educated Greeks. Philosophers in particular needed access to previous writings. Aristotle, who founded the Lyceum at Athens in the fourth century BCE, is traditionally associated with a substantial personal collection. His school illustrates an important development: the library becoming part of an organised institution of teaching and research.
Greek books generally took the form of papyrus rolls. Reading a large work meant physically unrolling the scroll while rolling up the portion already read. There were no page numbers and initially relatively few of the aids to reading that we take for granted, such as punctuation, indexes or detailed divisions into chapters.
After Alexander the Great’s conquests, Greek culture spread across the eastern Mediterranean and the Near East. Hellenistic rulers competed culturally as well as politically, and important royal libraries appeared at centres such as Alexandria and Pergamum. Scholarship increasingly involved comparing manuscripts, establishing authoritative versions of older works and producing catalogues and commentaries. Librarianship was beginning to become an intellectual activity in its own right.
Roman Libraries
The Romans absorbed much of Greek literary culture. Wealthy Romans assembled private libraries, often containing separate collections of Greek and Latin texts. Books became an indication of education and social standing.
Libraries also became part of public life. Julius Caesar reportedly contemplated establishing a major public library in Rome, but the project was not completed before his assassination. Shortly afterwards, in the first century BCE, the politician and writer Asinius Pollio established what is generally regarded as Rome’s first public library.
Augustus and subsequent emperors created others. Public libraries were often associated with temples, baths or monumental complexes and commonly contained separate Greek and Latin sections. By the imperial period Rome possessed a number of libraries, while libraries also appeared in provincial cities.
However, “public” requires qualification. These institutions were not equivalent to a modern municipal lending library. Their users were principally members of the educated classes, and books were normally consulted on the premises rather than borrowed.
Roman books existed both as scrolls and, increasingly from the early centuries CE, in the form of the codex: separate leaves bound together along one edge. The codex was easier to consult, could contain writing on both sides of the page and made it much simpler to locate a particular passage. Its adoption, strongly encouraged by early Christians, was one of the most important developments in the history of the book.
When Roman political authority in western Europe collapsed during the fifth century, many urban institutions disappeared or declined. The survival of libraries and written culture increasingly depended upon the Christian Church.
Monastic Libraries in England
Roman Britain had undoubtedly contained books and written records, although little survives that allows us to reconstruct anything resembling a substantial Roman library in Britain. Following the end of Roman rule in the early fifth century, literacy declined sharply and many of the institutions that had supported written culture disappeared.
The conversion of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms to Christianity from the late sixth century brought England back into the Latin literary world. Books were essential to Christianity. Churches required biblical and liturgical texts, while clergy needed works on theology, grammar, history and the calculation of the Church calendar.
Monasteries consequently became the principal custodians of books. Their libraries were very small by modern standards. A monastery possessing a few dozen books might have an important collection. Every manuscript had to be copied by hand, usually onto parchment or vellum prepared from animal skins. The process was slow and expensive.
Some monasteries developed scriptoria in which manuscripts were copied, although the familiar image of every medieval monastery possessing a large room full of monks continuously copying books is an oversimplification. Nevertheless, copying within religious communities was crucial to the preservation and transmission of texts.
Among the most important early English centres were Wearmouth and Jarrow in Northumbria. Benedict Biscop, who founded the monasteries during the seventh century, travelled repeatedly to the Continent and returned with books. Their library provided the resources used by Bede, one of the leading scholars of early medieval Europe. His Ecclesiastical History of the English People, completed in 731, demonstrates how sophisticated scholarship could emerge from a monastic library far from the former centres of the Roman world.
Canterbury, York and other ecclesiastical centres also developed important collections. Books travelled between England, Ireland and continental Europe, while English missionaries carried manuscripts in the opposite direction when they helped establish monasteries abroad.
However, Viking attacks from the late eighth century destroyed or disrupted many monasteries and their collections. A revival of learning accompanied the monastic reforms of the tenth century, and following the Norman Conquest in 1066 the number and wealth of monasteries increased substantially.
The larger Benedictine, Cistercian and Augustinian houses accumulated increasingly substantial libraries. Books covered theology and scripture but also canon law, medicine, classical literature, history, philosophy and science. Catalogues and borrowing records from some monasteries reveal carefully organised collections.
Because manuscripts were so valuable, security was important. Books might be kept in locked cupboards or chests. Later medieval libraries sometimes chained books to desks or shelves, permitting them to be consulted while preventing their removal. The chain was essentially a security device protecting an object that could represent months of skilled labour and considerable expense.
Cathedral libraries developed alongside monastic ones. One well-known survival is the chained library at Hereford Cathedral, principally dating from the later medieval and early modern periods.
The Dissolution of the Monasteries
The Dissolution of the Monasteries under Henry VIII between 1536 and 1540 was one of the most disruptive episodes in the history of English libraries.
By the early sixteenth century the monasteries collectively held a substantial proportion of England’s surviving medieval manuscripts. When the religious houses were suppressed, their buildings, lands and possessions were taken by the Crown and subsequently dispersed or sold. Their libraries were treated in much the same way.
Some manuscripts entered royal, university, cathedral or private collections and survived. Antiquaries and collectors recognised that certain books had historical value and sought to preserve them. Matthew Parker, Archbishop of Canterbury under Elizabeth I, was one such collector. His interest in early English Christianity led him to assemble manuscripts that might otherwise have disappeared; many of these later formed the Parker Library at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge.
However, a considerable quantity of material was lost. Books judged obsolete, especially theological works associated with medieval Catholicism, had little commercial value. Parchment manuscripts were sometimes dismantled and reused in bookbindings, as covers for accounts or for other practical purposes. Others were sold or simply discarded.
The scale of the loss cannot be calculated precisely because the contents of many monastic libraries are themselves known only incompletely. Surviving catalogues nevertheless indicate that collections which had been built up over several centuries were scattered within a relatively short period.
The Dissolution therefore had a mixed effect. It destroyed the institutional setting in which many medieval libraries had developed, but it also transferred manuscripts into new forms of ownership. Some entered universities and private collections and eventually found their way into institutions such as the Bodleian Library and British Museum. Much of what survives of England’s medieval written heritage does so because individual collectors rescued manuscripts during or after this period.
The Universities
The emergence of universities created another important home for libraries. Oxford developed as a centre of teaching during the twelfth century and Cambridge during the thirteenth. Initially students and teachers largely depended upon their own books or those belonging to individual colleges and religious houses.
Before printing, books remained expensive. University teaching therefore relied heavily upon lectures in which the master read from and explained an authoritative text. The word “lecture”, derived from the Latin lectura, reflects this culture of reading aloud.
Oxford gradually developed institutional collections. Thomas Cobham, Bishop of Worcester, attempted to establish a university library during the early fourteenth century. A more substantial collection followed in the fifteenth century when Humfrey, Duke of Gloucester, brother of Henry V, donated hundreds of manuscripts to Oxford. A library was built to house them above the Divinity School; part survives as Duke Humfrey’s Library.
The religious and political changes of the sixteenth century proved damaging to many medieval collections. Manuscripts regarded as associated with Roman Catholicism or scholastic learning were removed or destroyed, and Oxford’s university library was largely dispersed.
Its revival was the work of Sir Thomas Bodley, a former diplomat and Oxford scholar. Bodley refitted the old library and acquired books on a large scale. The restored Bodleian Library opened to scholars in 1602. In 1610 Bodley reached an agreement with the Stationers’ Company under which the library was to receive copies of new books registered by the company, an important precursor of the later system of legal deposit.
Cambridge University Library developed from collections assembled during the fifteenth century and grew particularly rapidly after printing transformed the availability of books. Under the Copyright Act of 1710 it became one of the libraries entitled to receive deposited copies of newly published books, increasing the scope of its collections.
The universities also developed college libraries. Some possessed important manuscript and early printed collections, although access remained overwhelmingly restricted to members of the university.
Printing Transforms the Library
Johannes Gutenberg’s development in Europe of printing with movable metal type during the mid-fifteenth century eventually transformed every kind of library.
A manuscript might take months to copy. A printer could produce hundreds of substantially identical copies of a book in a fraction of the time. Books did not immediately become cheap, but their number increased and their relative cost gradually fell.
Libraries consequently changed in scale. Collections numbering thousands or tens of thousands of books became possible. The physical form of the library also changed. Medieval lecterns and chained volumes gradually gave way to shelving systems designed to hold growing numbers of printed books.
Printing also stimulated the development of bibliographies and catalogues. As the number of books increased, simply possessing them was no longer enough: readers needed ways of discovering what was available. The problem of organising information, first encountered by the keepers of Mesopotamian tablets, became steadily more complex.
At the same time, private libraries flourished among aristocrats, clergy, physicians, lawyers and prosperous merchants. Some collections eventually passed into universities or public institutions. The modern research library owes a considerable part of its holdings to centuries of private collecting.
Early Libraries for Wider Use
Long before the nineteenth-century public library movement, a number of attempts were made to make books available beyond universities and monasteries.
Parish and church libraries were established in various places. Some were created specifically for clergymen who could not afford large collections of their own. Others were accessible to educated inhabitants of a town.
One notable development occurred in Manchester. Humphrey Chetham, a wealthy merchant who died in 1653, provided for the establishment of a library that should be available without charge. His will specified that the librarian should require nothing from those coming to use it. Chetham’s Library opened to readers in the 1650s and has continued in use ever since. It describes itself as Britain’s oldest surviving public library, although it was essentially a reference collection rather than a modern lending library.
Such examples were important, but exceptional. For most people in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century England, access to a worthwhile collection of books still depended upon wealth, education or institutional membership.
However, that began to change as literacy increased and a larger reading public emerged.
Subscription Libraries
The eighteenth century saw rapid expansion in publishing. Newspapers, magazines, novels, histories, travel books and works of science reached an increasingly broad middle-class readership. Buying many books remained expensive, creating an opportunity for shared collections.
One solution was the subscription library.
There were several variations, but members generally paid an entrance fee and annual subscription in return for access to a jointly maintained collection. Some were proprietary libraries in which members effectively owned shares in the institution and participated in its management.
The Leeds Library, founded in 1768, is the oldest surviving proprietary subscription library of its kind in the British Isles. It was created, owned and run by its members and provides a good example of the institutions that appeared in many prosperous towns during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.
Subscription libraries were significant because they widened access beyond aristocratic and university circles. Their membership typically came from the professional, commercial and prosperous middle classes: doctors, lawyers, clergymen, merchants and manufacturers. Women also made use of libraries, although membership arrangements varied and formal control was often in male hands.
The collections of subscription libraries reflected the interests of their members. History, biography, travel, theology, science and literature were commonly represented, alongside periodicals and newspapers. Many institutions also acted as social and intellectual centres where lectures, discussions and meetings might take place.
They were therefore more than simply places from which books could be borrowed. In many towns they formed part of a wider culture of voluntary associations through which the middle classes organised education and intellectual life.
Commercial Circulating Libraries
Commercial circulating libraries operated on a different basis.
A subscription library was generally an association maintained for the benefit of its members. A circulating library was a business. Its proprietor bought books and lent them to customers in return for a subscription or fee.
Circulating libraries had existed from at least the early eighteenth century and became increasingly common in towns and cities. Booksellers often operated them alongside their retail businesses. For readers who wished to follow new publications but could not afford to buy them, borrowing was economical.
Their importance was particularly marked in relation to fiction. Novels were popular but relatively expensive, and many people who read them did so through circulating libraries. Publishers consequently knew that a relatively small number of large libraries could account for a significant part of a novel’s initial sales.
Mudie’s Select Library, founded by Charles Edward Mudie in London in 1842, became the best-known nineteenth-century example. It supplied books not only to London subscribers but also to readers elsewhere through branch and postal arrangements.
Mudie’s purchasing power gave it influence over publishing. It could order hundreds of copies of a title that it considered suitable for its subscribers, while refusing books it considered objectionable. Publishers therefore had a commercial reason to take its judgements into account.
The Victorian three-volume novel was closely associated with this system. A new novel might be issued in three separate volumes at a total price beyond the means of many individual readers. A circulating library could buy the set and lend the volumes successively to different subscribers. The arrangement suited publishers and libraries, although it came under increasing pressure towards the end of the nineteenth century as cheaper one-volume editions became more common.
Circulating libraries also provided an important reading outlet for women, particularly those whose domestic circumstances restricted access to clubs, universities and other institutions. Fiction, travel writing, biography and periodicals could all be obtained through subscription.
The distinction between the two forms of library is therefore worth preserving. Subscription libraries represented collective ownership by a limited membership; circulating libraries represented commercial lending. Both expanded access to books, but both depended upon the ability to pay.
Neither embodied the later public-library principle that access should be available to everyone and financed through local taxation.
Mechanics’ Institutes and Working-Class Readers
The Industrial Revolution created an expanding population of skilled workers, clerks and artisans for whom literacy and technical knowledge were increasingly valuable.
Mechanics’ institutes began appearing during the 1820s with the aim of providing working men with instruction in science and useful knowledge. Lectures and classes were central, but libraries and reading rooms became an important part of most institutes.
Other organisations—including literary and philosophical societies, working men’s clubs, religious organisations and mutual improvement societies—also maintained collections and reading rooms.
These organisations helped demonstrate that there was a demand for reading outside the traditional educated elite. They also helped establish the idea that access to books could promote education, self-improvement and responsible citizenship.
Meanwhile, improvements in elementary education and the growth of inexpensive newspapers and books created an ever larger potential readership.
The conditions were therefore emerging for the modern public library.
The Public Libraries Act 1850
The decisive legislative breakthrough came through the efforts of campaigners including the MPs William Ewart and Joseph Brotherton and the librarian Edward Edwards.
Parliamentary investigation during the 1840s drew attention to the relative weakness of publicly accessible libraries in Britain compared with some European countries. The result was the Public Libraries Act 1850.
The Act was cautious. It applied initially to sufficiently large boroughs and required substantial local approval before a library rate could be levied. The amount that could be raised was strictly limited, and the money raised through the rate could not initially be used to buy books. Supporters often therefore depended upon donations to create the collections themselves.
These restrictions reflected opposition to the principle of publicly funded libraries. Critics questioned why ratepayers should pay for other people to read books. Others feared that libraries might encourage unsuitable political ideas, while some doubted whether working people would use them constructively.
Supporters made the opposite argument. Libraries, they believed, promoted education, sobriety and self-improvement. A worker spending an evening reading was preferable, in their view, to one spending it in the public house.
Despite its limitations, the 1850 Act established the fundamental principle that local taxation could legitimately be used to provide libraries.
Manchester took the lead. Its Free Public Library opened in September 1852 and was the first local authority lending and reference library established under the 1850 legislation. Salford had opened a municipal library earlier, in 1850, under previous museums legislation.
Subsequent legislation relaxed the original restrictions and extended library provision. During the second half of the nineteenth century towns and cities across England adopted the public library system.
The Victorian Public Library
The public library fitted particularly well with Victorian ideas of education and improvement.
Industrial towns were growing rapidly. Elementary education was expanding, especially after the Education Act 1870, while compulsory schooling and increasing literacy created generations of potential library users.
Municipal pride was another important factor. Town halls, museums, art galleries and libraries demonstrated the prosperity and civic ambition of expanding towns. Many Victorian and Edwardian libraries were substantial public buildings, reflecting the value placed upon education and knowledge.
Libraries commonly contained a reference department, lending library, reading room and newspaper room. The latter could be especially popular because newspapers were comparatively expensive for individuals to purchase regularly.
Attitudes towards fiction changed only gradually. Some early librarians and committees regarded serious history, biography, science and literature as more appropriate than popular novels. Readers frequently had different priorities. Fiction became a major part of lending, sometimes to the concern of those who regarded the public library primarily as an instrument of education.
The organisation of libraries also became increasingly professional. Cataloguing systems improved, trained librarians became more common and professional organisations emerged. The Library Association was founded in 1877.
Originally borrowers often selected a book from a catalogue and requested it from a member of staff, who retrieved it from shelves inaccessible to the public. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries open-access shelving gradually spread, allowing readers to browse for themselves. This apparently simple change altered the relationship between readers and books.
Andrew Carnegie
No individual is more closely associated with the expansion of public library buildings around the turn of the twentieth century than Andrew Carnegie.
Born in Dunfermline in Scotland in 1835, Carnegie emigrated to the United States and made his fortune in the steel industry. He became convinced that the wealthy had a responsibility to use part of their wealth for public benefit, and libraries became one of the principal objects of his philanthropy.
Carnegie generally provided money for a library building on condition that the local authority supplied the site, books and continuing expenditure. This was important: he intended to encourage permanent community provision rather than create libraries dependent indefinitely upon philanthropy.
More than 2,500 Carnegie library buildings were funded worldwide, including hundreds in Britain and Ireland.
Their architectural styles varied, but the Carnegie library became a familiar feature of many towns. His philanthropy accelerated a movement that was already under way and helped turn the public library into an established element of civic life.
Libraries in the Twentieth Century
By the early twentieth century the principle of the public library had been firmly established, although provision remained uneven.
Libraries increasingly developed specialised services for children, whose importance grew as universal education became established. Dedicated children’s rooms, specialist librarians and organised activities encouraged children to regard library membership as a normal part of growing up.
Branch libraries extended services from town centres into suburbs and housing estates. Libraries also developed collections of music, maps, local history material and, eventually, recorded sound and film.
The public library’s educational role remained important but became less paternalistic. Rather than deciding what people ought to read, libraries increasingly sought to provide what their users actually wanted while maintaining serious reference and educational collections.
After the Second World War public provision expanded alongside other local authority services. The Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964 reorganised the statutory basis of the service in England and Wales. It imposed upon library authorities the duty of providing a “comprehensive and efficient” library service for those living, working or studying in their area. That statutory obligation remains the foundation of public library provision in England.
Libraries also became increasingly important as community spaces rather than simply repositories for books. Exhibitions, lectures, children’s activities, study facilities and local information services became commonplace.
The British Museum Library
While municipal libraries were developing for local communities, Britain was also creating a national collection on a different scale.
The British Museum was founded by Act of Parliament in 1753, largely around the collections of the physician and collector Sir Hans Sloane. These contained not only natural-history specimens and antiquities but a substantial library of printed books and manuscripts.
Other major collections were added, including the Cottonian and Harleian manuscripts and the Old Royal Library. The latter brought with it an important privilege: the right to receive copies of books under legal deposit.
The British Museum therefore developed simultaneously as a museum and a national library.
During the nineteenth century its library expanded considerably. One of the most important figures in its history was Antonio Panizzi, an Italian political exile who joined the staff in 1831 and eventually became Principal Librarian.
Panizzi transformed the organisation and cataloguing of the collections and campaigned for more books, staff and space. His work helped establish detailed cataloguing principles that influenced librarianship beyond the British Museum.
A visible result of this expansion was the circular Reading Room constructed in the centre of the British Museum courtyard and opened in 1857. For more than a century it became an important place of study.
Its readers included Karl Marx, who worked there while developing his economic theories, as well as generations of historians, writers and researchers. The reading room represented the ideal of the research library: a large collection of knowledge placed within reach of the serious reader.
However, the continuing growth of publishing created an increasing problem. Legal deposit and continuous acquisition meant that books accumulated faster than the Bloomsbury site could comfortably accommodate them. Storage was dispersed among different buildings, while modern scientific and technical information created demands different from those of the eighteenth-century museum library.
Eventually the argument developed that Britain’s national library collections required an independent institution.
The British Library
The British Library Act 1972 established the British Library, which formally came into existence on 1 July 1973. It brought together several organisations and collections, most importantly the library departments of the British Museum, but also bodies including the National Central Library and the National Lending Library for Science and Technology.
Creating the institution was easier than giving it a permanent home.
After prolonged planning and political controversy, a new building was constructed at St Pancras in London. The transfer of collections took place during the 1990s and the new British Library complex came fully into operation towards the end of that decade.
The St Pancras building holds reading rooms, exhibition galleries and large quantities of material in controlled storage. At its centre, visible through glass, is the King’s Library, the collection assembled by George III and presented to the nation by George IV.
The British Library’s holdings extend far beyond ordinary printed books. They include manuscripts, newspapers, maps, music, patents, stamps, photographs and sound recordings as well as digital material. Among its holdings are Magna Carta manuscripts, the Lindisfarne Gospels, Shakespeare quartos, Leonardo da Vinci’s notebooks and manuscripts and papers associated with many writers and composers.
At the heart of its continuing growth is legal deposit. Publishers are required to deposit material so that the country’s published output can be preserved for future generations. The British Library automatically receives UK publications, while five other legal deposit libraries—the Bodleian Library at Oxford, Cambridge University Library, the National Library of Scotland, the National Library of Wales and Trinity College Dublin—have rights to claim publications.
Legal deposit was extended to electronic publications in 2013, recognising that an increasing proportion of the national record is created digitally rather than printed on paper.
The British Library therefore performs a role similar in principle to the earliest libraries of Mesopotamia: preserving society’s written record. The difference lies in the scale, range of media and breadth of access.
Libraries in the Digital Age
For thousands of years the fundamental problem facing a library was scarcity. Books were difficult to produce, expensive to obtain and physically located in one place.
The digital revolution has partly reversed the problem. Information is now abundant.
Computerised catalogues began replacing card catalogues during the later twentieth century. Databases allowed readers to search millions of records quickly. The internet then enabled library catalogues to be searched from home, while electronic journals, digitised manuscripts and e-books made it possible to consult material without physically handling the original.
Digitisation has changed research considerably. A medieval manuscript, newspaper or rare printed book that once required a journey to a particular library may now be examined on a computer elsewhere. Digital copies also reduce handling of fragile originals.
However, digital information creates its own problems. Electronic material can disappear when websites close, software becomes obsolete or storage systems fail. Libraries therefore increasingly preserve websites and other digital publications as well as physical books.
Public libraries have also adapted. Many now provide computers, internet access, Wi-Fi, e-books, audiobooks, online databases, local studies resources, activities for children and adults, and help for people who need access to digital government and commercial services.
The spread of the internet has therefore not removed the need for libraries. Instead it has altered their function. The librarian is no longer simply the custodian of a finite collection of books but increasingly someone who helps users navigate a very large quantity of information and distinguish reliable material from the unreliable.
There have nevertheless been serious pressures on the public library system. Local authority financial constraints have led to reductions in opening hours and the closure or transfer to community management of some branches. At the same time, patterns of borrowing have changed as people buy inexpensive books online or read electronically.
The question confronting libraries is therefore much the same as it has been at several earlier moments in their history: how should they adapt when the technology through which knowledge is recorded and transmitted changes?
From Clay Tablets to Digital Collections
The physical form of the library has changed almost beyond recognition. A Sumerian scribe arranging clay tablets on shelves would find little familiar in a modern building filled with books, computers and electronic databases.
Yet the basic problems would be recognisable.
What information should be preserved? How should it be organised? How can one item be found among thousands or millions? Who should be allowed to consult it? Who should pay for its preservation? And how can knowledge survive when political institutions, technologies and societies themselves change?
For most of history, libraries preserved knowledge principally for small privileged groups. Mesopotamian scribes served temples and rulers. Egyptian and classical libraries served priests, administrators and scholars. Medieval monastic libraries served religious communities. University libraries served academics, while subscription libraries principally served those prosperous enough to afford membership.
The principal transformation of the nineteenth century was therefore not merely the construction of larger libraries. It was the emergence of a new principle: that access to books and knowledge should be available to the population generally and supported from public funds.
The modern public library grew from that idea.
At the other end of the scale, the British Library embodies a complementary principle—that a society should systematically preserve its intellectual and cultural record, including material whose value may not become apparent until generations after it was created.
From the clay tablets of ancient Mesopotamia to electronic legal deposit, libraries have consequently performed two functions that are easily taken for granted but fundamental to civilisation. They preserve the accumulated memory of the past, and they make that memory available to people in the present.
The technology has changed repeatedly. The purpose has proved remarkably durable.
Odds and Sods
Mobile libraries
One way of extending public-library provision beyond towns was the mobile library. Horse-drawn and motorised travelling libraries appeared in various forms from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but they became particularly associated with rural library services after the Second World War.
A mobile library could carry a changing stock of books to villages, housing estates and isolated communities that could not support a permanent branch library. Regular stopping points allowed readers to borrow and return books much as they would at a conventional library.
Mobile libraries became especially important in rural counties, where distance and limited public transport could otherwise restrict access. Their numbers have declined in recent decades as local authorities have reduced expenditure and patterns of borrowing have changed, but some services continue to operate.
Micro-libraries
A more recent development has been the growth of small, informal book exchanges sometimes described as micro-libraries, community libraries or book boxes.
These may consist of a small cabinet, converted telephone box or other weatherproof structure placed in a village, residential street, railway station, community centre or similar location. People are generally free to take a book and leave another without formal membership or borrowing records.
They are not public libraries in the statutory sense and usually depend upon volunteers rather than professional librarians. Their collections are also limited and largely accidental. Nevertheless, they represent a simple continuation of the long tradition of sharing books within a community.
Micro-libraries have become more visible during the twenty-first century, partly because redundant telephone kiosks and other small public structures have been adapted for the purpose. They complement rather than replace conventional public libraries.
Acknowledgements
Images in this article have been taken from the Internet. The captions contain links to the originals. Contact me if you consider that I have infringed any copyright.
Version History
Version 1.0 – September 2026.