Random ramblings on football by an old fogie

I played football until the mid-1970s, and if you wander around this website you will see that I have penned a couple of potted histories on the game, principally in England.

What follows are some personal random ramblings on the game itself, memorable moments, along with a view on a modest number of outstanding players and teams. They simply comprise those items which immediately spring to my mind in the first instance.

The Game

What game are we playing? The FA came into existence in 1863, followed by the RFU in 1871. However, it was to be well into the 1880s before football and rugby each managed to establish their own unique, individual identities that would attract affiliated clubs in significant numbers. Before we reached that stage, many games were played according to rules which were just agreed by the teams before kick-off. They probably mainly related to rules on handling the ball.

Goal nets were invented by John Brodie, a civil engineer in Liverpool. He applied for a patent in 1890 after witnessing arguments over whether a goal had been scored in a game between Everton and Accrington Stanley in the previous year. The first version included bells which were meant to ring when the ball hit the net. Liverpool Ramblers tried out the nets for him, discovering that the bells did not ring. Nets without bells were trialled by the FA in 1891 and were in use from the following year.

Penalty kicks were introduced in 1891 to the annoyance of gentleman amateurs, notably Corinthians, who considered that a gentleman would never deliberately foul an opponent. If a penalty was awarded against them the goalkeeper would vacate the goal while the kick was taken, and if they were awarded a penalty then they would deliberately miss it.

Black marks against the FA. Senior positions within the FA were filled by members of the (conservative) elite. Their reputation was sullied (for me) by two notable episodes: effectively banning women from playing the game in the 1920s; and forbidding matches to be played on Sundays from 1910.

World War I saw the shortage of available men in the labour market and the requirement for women to fill the gaps. It also provided the opportunity for them to play football. There were at least 150 teams by 1921 when a crowd of 53,000 watched a game with ladies from Dick, Kerr (a munitions factory). Unfortunately, the FA then started a campaign to ban women from playing, the most specious pretext being that excessive exercise was dangerous to their health. It was to be the end of the 1960s before women’s football was able to begin the long journey towards national acceptance.

Dock workers were one section of the labour force who worked on Saturdays. Their attempts to play on Sundays were thwarted by the FA who banned matches on the Sabbath in 1910. Unaffiliated Sunday leagues sprang up, although the FA banned any player or referee who took part in them. It was to be 1960 before the FA recognised Sunday Football, and only then, I would argue, because it feared the growth of the National Sunday Football Association which had been set up in 1932 and now claimed to represent an estimated 73 leagues, 2,500 clubs and 500,000 players.

Some Memorable Moments and Matches

Ferenc Puskas’ drag-back for Hungary’s third goal when they comprehensively beat England 6-3 at Wembley in 1953. The first-ever drag back?

The 1960 European Cup final when Real Madrid beat Eintracht Frankfurt 7-3, featuring Di Stefano and Puskas in their pomp. The FA sent out recordings of the match which were shown in schools.

Gordon Banks’ save from Pele’s header in the 1970 World Cup.

Brazil’s fourth goal against Italy in the 1970 World Cup final. As commentator Kenneth Wolstenholme put it .. “that was sheer delightful football” in the days before commentators got really carried away.

The Johan Cruyff turn against Sweden in the 1974 World Cup.

The Marseille turn was invented by Jose Farias in the 1960s. It was subsequently given various other names such as the Spin and the Roulette when it was used and adapted by the likes of Maradona and Zidane.

Maradona’s mazy dribble from the halfway line and goal against England in the 1986 World Cup. “You have to say that that was magnificent” said Barry Davies. This was Argentina’s second goal. We shall discretely refrain from mentioning the first (the handball goal)!

Zidane’s exquisitely volleyed goal against Bayer Leverkusen in the 2002 Champions League final. His celebration indicated that he thought that it was pretty good, probably because it was with his left foot?

Some Memorable Players

Gordon Banks
Franz Beckenbauer when playing sweeper
Bobby Moore
Paolo Maldini at full-back
Pele
Johan Cruyff
Diego Maradona
Zinedin Zidane
Lionel Messi.

Zidane was my personal favourite. His trickery brought audible gasps from commentators as well as the crowd.

Some Memorable Teams

Hungary in the 1950s.
Brazil in the 1970 World Cup.
The Netherlands with their Total Football, particularly in the 1974 World Cup.
Barcelona and Spain with their tiki-taka style of play around 2010 and 2012.

Finally, not a team but a midfield trio. Nicknamed ”The Holy Trinity”, Kendall, Ball and Harvey warrant a mention because they formed an ideal combination for Everton in the late 1960s, each contributing a set of complementary strengths. Kendall was a strong all-round player, Ball a lively attacking midfielder, while Harvey was to my mind the most naturally skilful of the three.

The Beautiful Game?

Football is undoubtedly the most popular sport in the world and often very exciting, but is it beautiful? In very occasional patches this old fogie would venture.

BK
June 2026

Thoughts on AI Chatbots – May 2026

I have been using the paid for version of ChatGPT lately. Here are some initial thoughts.

Research. I have used it to verify my understanding of historical events, and to optionally add to that understanding. It has been very useful in this respect. However, it is not infallible. The problem seems to relate more to missing elements rather than erroneous information. If I prod it .. “what about x” .. then it will include the missing item(s).

Writing Style. This is undoubtedly more polished than my own. However, apart from very occasionally using a short paragraph, I do not use longer pieces because: (a) they do not correspond to my writing style; and (b) the message that they are seeking to portray generally differs from my own.

Code. I have used it to write a small amount of code in VBA, relatively successfully. It was mainly a case of stepwise refinement, i.e. you need to check that the results are correct rather than just assuming that they are. I note that Claude seems to be the go-to Chatbot in this area.

Chatbot use of my material. My website is not a commercial undertaking, and so I have no great objection to the use of the information so long as it is attributed. Question – how do they know if it is reasonable to trust it?

Very Simplistic Comparison of Chatbots

I asked them to give me an overview of my website:

  • ChatGPT gave the most detailed response (possibly because it knew me?)
  • Gemini arguably came second, just ahead of Claude
  • Co-Pilot and Perplexity both produced shorter summaries.

I am sure that they will all improve over time.

It would be useful to hear the views of others.

Martin's Cheese Show

A visit to Martin’s restaurant became one of the highlights of our Edinburgh Festival visits.  It was situated in an unprepossessing street off Rose Lane (Rose Lane North) that you were only likely to find by accident if you did not already know that it was there. I am not aware that it was widely advertised, relying mainly on recommendations by word of mouth. The Good Food Guide, as guides are prone to do, provided a somewhat dry description of the place which in no way did it justice. 

It attracted more than its fair share of celebrities; I read that Kofi Annan, complete with bodyguards, dropped in during the G8 summit. It was a relatively small and intimate place which was owned and run by Martin and Gay Irons, an extremely pleasant and unassuming couple.  The emphasis was on the use of high-quality ingredients; a scallop dish that we had there was among the top two or three scallop dishes that we have had anywhere.  Overall, the food was of a high standard and the wine list perfectly satisfactory.  Service was excellent, being attentive without being intrusive, as it is in too many restaurants today where the emphasis seems to be on getting you in and out of the door as quickly as possible.

The pièce de résistance was what we fondly remember as “Martin’s Cheese Show” – they specialised in unpasteurized Scottish and Irish cheeses.  On earlier visits we had always been limited for time, rushing between shows, and consequently we never had time for a dessert.  However, we eventually managed to organise ourselves so that we could spend a more leisurely couple of hours over the meal. The restaurant was fairly full on the evening in question, but we were first to get to the dessert stage having been the earliest couple to arrive. Being a cheese lover, my choice was a foregone conclusion.  Martin carefully threaded his way between the tables with the cheese trolley and the show, for that is what it was, commenced. 

It took over 10 minutes, as he put on a captivating and frequently amusing performance on a subject that was very obviously a passion.  He started with the Irish cheeses, introducing us to the likes of: Cooleeneye – made by Breda Maher in County Tipperary – he even produced a picture of Bridget the cow, one of the Kerry herd; and Ardrachan – made by Mary Burns in County Cork.  Moving to Scotland, he introduced Lanark Blue, regaling us with the story of how the maker, Humphrey Errington, was unsuccessfully pursued by the “cheese police” – a tale of failed attempts to outlaw so called dangerous, i.e. unpasteurized, cheeses. Errington’s Revenge, Martin’s name for an evil-looking cheese, eventually brought the show to a conclusion.

I had noticed that, as the performance proceeded, other diners gradually started to listen in, until by the end the whole room seemed to be in rapt attention, all equally enthralled by the performance, so much so that every table appeared to have at least one person that plumped for the cheese, and of course they were each treated to a performance of Martin’s show.  We sampled the show on subsequent visits and never tired of it, although we did notice that Bridget seemed to change over the years! And yes – the cheeses were excellent.  If you are a cheese lover then a visit to one of Mellis’s excellent cheese emporia is essential, where some of the above-mentioned cheeses can be found.

I originally penned this piece around 2005. Unfortunately, the restaurant no longer exists. A great loss. I have resurrected this content, along with other items that come under the title of Edinburgh Memories.

Breakfast at Sibbet House

Jim and Aurora Sibbet

We struck gold in our first year at the Edinburgh Festival when we picked Sibbet House from The Which Guide to Bed & Breakfasts, using that well-renowned and virtually infallible method of selection, “eeny meeny miny mo”.  It was run by Aurora and Jim Sibbet. 

When Janet rang to inquire whether there were any rooms available at the inn, we were fortunate to find that there was just one left. As repeated in the glossy literature that subsequently arrived, Jim promised over the phone to play the bagpipes at breakfast – but we went anyway.

The house had a wonderful hanging staircase that elegantly snaked its way up to the top floor. It was beautifully decorated and furnished by Aurora.  The highlight was a French style drawing room that looked like something straight out of one those country mansions where visitors are allowed to look but not to touch. Well, the room was for use by the guests although we sat down very gingerly on the first occasion that we eventually managed to summon up the courage to cross the threshold. 

The highlight was breakfast. Jim was “front of house”, with Aurora acting as the chef.  He was an assiduous host, deciding on the seating arrangements, and ensuring that he introduced the guests to each other. He used any foible or relevant point of interest to break the ice, along with the occasional subtle sales pitch: “these are the Cohens, Susan and Cal from Washington DC, festival aficionados who have been staying with us for the last 15 years”. 

Service was punctuated with: keen observations such as American guests’ use of cutlery – what are they doing with the other hand?; frequent demonstrations of his encyclopedic knowledge of bus routes for those requiring directions; taking bookings for bagpipe recitals after breakfast; and recommendations on places to eat, usually to the north of Princes Street, as he proclaimed that the Old Town was “foreign parts”. 

This was followed by the daily joke, two if you were lucky, delivered in a dry style, perhaps accompanied by an anecdote or apocryphal tale. This could be followed by: a lesson in business; reviews of the shows that Aurora and he had seen the previous day; the role of organised religion in modern society (well in any society actually); plus totally unbiased views on the political scene (?!). They were all among the many topics in his catholic repertoire.  It was always important to ensure that requests for extra toast were made between topics, so as not to disrupt the flow. 

There were occasional references to the chef, protesting that, while he had been married to her for over 40 years, it was never going to last.  Aurora’s arrival on completion of her duties in the kitchen was always the signal for a more in-depth discussion of the festival.

There was no discrimination: people of all nationalities, religions, political hues – even “woolly liberals” as he called us (for several years we used to sport a “Friends of the Earth” bag for carrying our bits and pieces around during the day) – were welcomed and encouraged to participate in the performance.  His virtuoso routine was typically completed in around 45 minutes, but those who were acquainted with Jim, as we came to be, knew that we had only to toss an appetizing snippet into the air on one of his other little specialist subjects to get the performance extended to an hour, possibly more: Human Resources (a job in one of his previous existences); the effectiveness of Edinburgh City Council – discuss; shocking changes in local architecture; or his latest property acquisition were all staple items. 

It was only the fact that the breakfast dishes were gradually disappearing around us, being quietly removed by a patient member of staff who had probably heard enough over the years to make a passable stand-in for Jim should the need arise, that we were eventually forced to face the day, and we departed to see some shows, have a few beers and a bite to eat, all to help kill the next 23 hours until it was time to experience this coup de theatre all over again.

This piece was written about 15 years ago, as part of our general Edinburgh experiences. I have resurrected it in honour of Jim Sibbet who is approaching his 90th birthday.